Before NATO, there was Afghanistan’s Taliban movement (you can’t call it a government, because it offered no protection and no services to its people). And the new Taliban, neo-Taliban, or whatever we call them have the same, tawdry, consistent practice of gratuitous cruelty in this regard–
Here’s the whole story from AFP wire, as printed by the Pakistan Daily Times:
WANA: Local Taliban militants seized and burned thousands of kilogrammes of food destined for pregnant women from a hospital in South Waziristan, officials said on Sunday.
The food, mainly lentils and cooking oil, had been supplied by the aid charity Save the Children to feed pregnant women suffering from malnutrition.
A Taliban activist said they were destroyed because “foreign NGOs want to harm our future generations.” An administration official, Tariq Salim, said the Health Ministry officials had not consulted him before distributing food directly to the women. Meanwhile, in North Waziristan, three people were killed and five wounded when troops conducted “retaliatory” strikes on suspected militant hideouts in Mir Ali, local officials said. Several houses were destroyed in the strikes that came after militants hit a checkpost with a missile barrage. One soldier was wounded in the rocket attack late Saturday, they said.
Well, if you could’ve seen me, I’d hopped right onto my local soapbox. And then I stepped right back off again, to think instead of react.
1. NGOs
It’s past time to honor the NGOs such as Save the Children whose work is dangerous and difficult. Those who deliver aid on-site face numerous disappointments and trials, but they are there, putting human concerns first. As of October 29th, the United Nations has documented the death of 34 aid workers in this troubled state for 2007. They are soldiers too–we need to look at it just like that.
2. Donors
It’s also past time to honor those who donate funds to worthy NGOs working in Afghanistan. Stories like this often make people wonder if their charitable impulses do any good–and this leads to what is often called “donor fatigue”. But worthy, well-run programs do make a difference. Not everything we do has the immediate effect we want it to, even with people we know. But in the long term, the expression and relationship makes a difference. In Afghanistan, where malnutrition, poverty, and childbed mortality are large problems, donations make a big difference.
3. In Unrelated News? Or, related News?
You can miss it if you read fast, but what is the relationship between the Waziristan official’s gripes about food distribution and the story of Taliban destruction of the warehouse? These are two separate issues, related only by being in the same story. But it brings some questions to mind:
What is the relationship between warehouse protection by regional officials and Taliban incursions? What is the relationship between NGO/government for coordinating aid efforts? What is the obstruction to aid efforts that are posed by regional officials? Questions like this can make you mad, but they should also remind one of the difficulties in getting an aid effort moving and its mission to the target recipients.
4. Evening out the competition
It’s strategically intelligent of the Taliban to bomb aid–because they don’t offer any. By decimating our ability to help Afghanistan’s people, the contrast between “them and us” becomes one only of who’s the meanest person around–a life full of fear and no benefit. We can’t give up on aid, or else Afghanistan’s people will have no horizon for the future. The fact that babies are involved only underscores the need for aid today.
I am angry–I am thinking about those expectant mothers who will not eat this week. But I am also humbled by the consistent heroism of those who are making aid happen in a world where “serving the people” seems to be a huge risk. I am thankful for those who have served so consistently, by deed and by donation, in Afghanistan.