Afghanistan: US/Canada Push for Greater Participation

In yet another US diplomatic attempt, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked NATO members for greater participation in all aspects of the war in Afghanistan. This call comes in the background of Canadian President Stephen Harper’s claim that he will withdraw his nation’s troops, which operate in the southern and most dangerous part of the country, within a year unless NATO adds 1,000 more troops. A senior Bush Administration official discussed the problem of differing rules of engagement and mission perception’s between NATO allies in Afghanistan by stating; ‘You can’t have some allies talking about how they’re developers and some talking about how they’re fighters. We all have to be both.”

There are numerous reasons (i.e. domestic politics, US war in Iraq, differing views of the threat level and ways to promote development and good governance) why the US and many of its EU alliance partners don’t see eye-to-eye about troop levels and mission strategies in Afghanistan and these fissures are strongly affecting the military campaign. As Bush’s term winds down, it will be interesting to see just how far his administration will push European NATO members to increase their participation in the country. Judging by Secretary of Defense Gates recent appeals and Rice’s Brussels’ visit, they want to keep the pressure on. EU leaders may just try to wait this administration out and see what the next president’s policy toward Afghanistan and NATO might be.

Can Bush garner greater participation from NATO’s EU states in Afghanistan before his term expires? Or will individual EU nation domestic constraints’ keep them from providing more troops or wider rules of engagement?

2 Responses to “Afghanistan: US/Canada Push for Greater Participation”

  1. Global Voices Online » Afghanistan: U.S. Pushes for NATO’s Wider Participation Says:

    […] Patrick Frost reports that U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked NATO members for greater participation in all aspects of the war in Afghanistan. Share This […]

  2. Central Asia » Blog Archive » Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan: Water Peace Says:

    […] In my short time as the lead writer for this blog, I have written much about NATO’s mission in Afghanistan, as I believe the nation’s stability and effective governance would do much for Central Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East regions.  On March 10th I discussed NATO troop levels and restrictions.  In light of the ongoing NATO Bucharest Summit, Foreign Policy has created The List: Who’s Left in Afghanistan?, which nicely catalogs individual NATO nation troop levels, restrictions of engagement, and provides an outlook into possible changes to these in the near future.  The report is rather disparaging to the nation’s who either have very low troop levels or major limitations as to what and where their troops can do and go.  The report specifically targets Germany, Austria, and Ireland for consternation. […]

Leave a Reply