<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kyrgyzstan: Hydropower dilemmas</title>
	<link>http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/07/09/kyrgyzstan-hydropower-dilemmas/</link>
	<description>American Foreign Policy Analysis in Central Asia</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Central Asia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kyrgyzstan: Hydropower capacities, part 2</title>
		<link>http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/07/09/kyrgyzstan-hydropower-dilemmas/#comment-816</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/07/09/kyrgyzstan-hydropower-dilemmas/#comment-816</guid>
					<description>[...] I wanted to go back to a previous post of last week on Kyrgyzstan&#8217;s potential hydropower development, because I couldn&#8217;t consider all the dilemmas in one post.  One dilemma I started to set up: much of the discussion concerns what kind of capacity would be needed in order to a. serve Kyrgyzstan; b. serve Central Asia&#8217;s power needs and develop energy commerce by exporting power.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I wanted to go back to a previous post of last week on Kyrgyzstan&#8217;s potential hydropower development, because I couldn&#8217;t consider all the dilemmas in one post.  One dilemma I started to set up: much of the discussion concerns what kind of capacity would be needed in order to a. serve Kyrgyzstan; b. serve Central Asia&#8217;s power needs and develop energy commerce by exporting power.  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
