Yesterday, an article about agricultural practice in the Ferghana Valley brought me up short, because the numbers in it just sounded wrong. However, I am no agricultural expert: I spent a good part of the day talking to some wonderful people who know and study cotton at Texas A & M University. In particular, I spoke with Dr. Kevin Bronson, a soil fertilizer specialist who spent part of two different spring seasons in Uzbekistan with the Winrock International NGO, advising cotton farmers. It was quite evident that he enjoyed his two tours of Uzbekistan: he particularly noted the hospitality of Uzbekistan's people.
Ferghana cotton yields, practices vs. U.S. cotton standards
Here is the official Uzbekistan television report. Parenthesis and brackets are my mathematical conversions and clarity edits.
The program informed [us] that from 13765 hectares (34,014 acres) of cultivated area in the district, 7318 hectares (18,083 acres) are allocated for cotton. At the present moment, 89242 kilos (196,745 pounds) of cotton seeds have been delivered from Pakhtaabad cotton factory's warehouse to the farms. The delivery was accompanied by law enforcement officers. An area of 1394 hectares (3,445 acres) was seeded [from that shipment] at the rate of sixty seven kilos of seeds per each hectare. (67 kilos per hectare = 59.77 pounds per acre). Today fifty-two tons of cotton seeds and six tons of cellophane film, used [for the work of] sowing are available at the factory's warehouse. . (. . . .)
Sixty pounds of cottonseed per acre is far more than is required to seed cotton fields. In the U.S. the seeding rate runs about 15 pounds of cottonseed per acre. However, over-seeding appears to be a compensatory process based upon other over-inputs, and procedural choices:
1. Scheduling: The cotton planting described in the news article starts far too early. Though the Ferghana Valley is more northern in latitude than, say, Texas, Texas has not yet sown cottonseed. Soil temperatures dictate the proper moment for planting; seeds germinate best in soil whose temperature has is 65 degrees for at least four days. Therefore, that six tons of cellophane, which is used to warm the soil after the seed has been planted, would be unnecessary if cotton farmers waited another four weeks to plant. Some soil thermometers would be a better purchase.
2. Over-input of water: Cotton is a crop that is prone to fungus and insect infestation, and one sure way to cut down the incidence of infestation is to use water strategically. Cotton does not need to be watered for the first month; according to Dr. Bronson, not only is early watering unnecessary, but counterproductive, stunting the seedlings' growth. Once irrigation commences, however, sufficient soil moisture is obtained by using alternate furrow irrigation. Alternate furrow irrigation sounds just like it is: not running water down every channel of the cotton field, but every other one.
3. Other prodigal inputs: Here is another paragraph from the article:
Chemicals and fertilizers, especially saltpeter, are also taken under strict account by Departments of Internal Affairs and delivered to farms from regional chemicals warehouses, always accompanied by a militiaman.
Since over-input of water causes cotton seed to run off out of the ground, stunts seedling growth, and contributes to fungal infestations, then it is also a root cause of other "waste of input", as Dr. Bronson called it. Fertilizer is applied to cotton fields in two-to-four times the quantity necessary. In India and Pakistan, around 120 pounds of nitrogenous fertilizer is applied per acre; in the Ferghana Valley, at least twice this much. Likewise, preventing root rot, etc, by limiting water is far less expensive than applying fungicide.
Note: The use of militiamen in fertilizer distribution possibly has to do with the type of saltpeter, which is not a technical term, but rather any of three basic substances. It suggests that rather than using urea or sodium nitrates, potassium nitrate is applied. Potassium nitrate can be used to make explosives.
On the off-chance that any Ministers of Agriculture are out there, reading this: There's an expert or two out there, maybe in the U.S., India or Pakistan, who can look at this information and verify it or amend it to your actual conditions.
References:
Dr. Kevin Bronson and Dr. Jackie Smith of Texas A & M University graciously spent a good part of their day on this information and gave me other leads for sources. Gig "em, Aggies! Thank you so kindly for the Texas hospitality‚ and the sufferance of my inexperience . . . .
Other sources:
FAO on Water User Associations & Khorezm
Texas A & M University System Agriculture and Research and Extension Center
The Cotton Corporation of India (state agricultural enterprise)
Cottonexperts.com, an agribusiness site with interesting reports, especially:
The first 40 days: Expert recommendations
Photos: Wildco.com, FAO

6 Comments So Far»
Hi Bonnie,
This Blog is quite impressive. I am trying to track you down! I met you at Norwich University last year, as you graduated with my fiance Galib. I am going to be visiting Washington, DC in June. Please contact me. I will pass this Blog to Galib as well.
Regards,
Cinnamon
Vancouver, BC
I wonder about the impact of such slapdash cotton cultivation on the Aral Sea… I mean in real, concrete terms. Like if maybe bringing cotton cultivation up to global or American standards would have a measurable impact, or just slow down the wasting.
Jashua,
You probably guessed that I am a “former” (there is no former) Texas Aggie from where I went for my information. There's good land out there, but not much water, and this is what they have developed: cotton farmers are not watering the first five weeks; watering every other furrow every other day; and using drip irrigation rather than the swamping irrigation shown in the picture. (this is from my interview notes–don't go be a cotton farmer based upon this primer).
There's quite a few environmental groups that talk about how bad cotton is, but really, a good method tames most of the madness. Probably water would do much better for the Aral under this system; it would not eradicate the salts already there–the legacy pollution–or the diseases that have already taken hold; it won't bring back an extinct species.
It would bring the rivers back first, and then the Sea would be last.
Bonnie, I think even if the fertilizer is a potential explosive, the reason for MIA and police involvement in its distribution is much more likely to prevent theft and remove from local control the accounting for where seed, fertilizer, and whatnot is going. This story only refers to the Andijon region, so I’d be curious to know what is going on elsewhere. But, I have my suspicion that in places like Jizzax, Samarqand, and Buxoro viloyats, local officials are allowed a bit more control over things. Since 2005, it seems that the Ferghana viloyats have almost entirely lost their place at the feeding trough and are coming under much more direct control from the executive. Samarqand controls cotton, if one believes the word about these things, but even there, the center is very concerned about efforts to cheat Tashkent out of revenues. (Rashidov is their patron saint, after all.) If I recall correctly, the MIA was a traditionally Samarqandi-run ministry, but I’m not sure what the background of its current head is.
On the larger point of improving methods, I just don't think the way the business is structured gives much incentive for reform. Elites make tons of money off of cotton by requiring that farmers lease land from the state, buy their seed from the state, and sell below market rates. Anything they sell above quota is profit, but no one ever really goes above their quota. In many ways, this is the same kind of pseudo-serfdom that one saw as a result of late-tsarist land reform in Turkestan. Elites make money, and investing in better irrigation and cultivation techniques cut into their profits. (And one figures in Uzbekistan that one must make money while one can, for power can be short-lived and is best extended with cash.) Farmers might be interested in improving things, but they have no resources to do so.
Agriculture in Uzbekistan is just depressing. Uzbeks could make great use of their land were they allowed to.
Dear Nathan,
These are all wonderful comments. I hope I answer some of what you have mentioned in the next post, but I have a feeling I will not get to all of it. Please check back and add knowledge at will. . . . or, if you post I will trackback. . .
And that goes for everyone. Thanks to all for the great comments!
I would also love to hear from some other agricultural experts, especially some who have been instrumental to or have studied or have lived the Green Revolution.
Dears,
I am doing drip irrigation business in Uzbekistan. Is there anyone who can help me with his/her advice about drip irrigation in cotton fields? I am really eager to help our farmers (and my country, of course) in improving their practice, water saving etc. From where I can get information about how to grow cotton with drip irrigation?
1 Pingback & Trackback
Leave Comments Below»