The Aral Sea Disaster, part 1: Count the cost
Three ways to measure degradation:
Micklin (2000) writes that the Aral Sea is a surface-fed rather than groundwater-fed lake: it relies upon water contributions from the Amu Darya and Syr Darya. Since it is located between Central Asia’s Kara-Kum, Kyzyl-Kum, and Baetpakdala deserts, its evaporation rate is relatively high. Lake evaporation contributes, however, to the atmospheric and ambient temperature of the surrounding area– a “climate cooling” function, so to speak, that is increasingly unavailable in the Aral Sea Basin.
The change in Aral Sea depth over the centuries, therefore, has largely been a function of river inflows, less the outgo from evaporation. According to Field (1954), previous to 1880, glacier advance in the mountains led to reduced riverine influx to the Aral Sea; however, world temperatures were lower then, which also affected the evaporation rate. That level remained remarkably stable, with lake level variations of plus or minus one meter.
Between 1960 and 1987, the Sea divided into two lakes, North and South. The South lake has also divided. One small lake lies to the west and another, larger lake to the east, although at times there has been a channel between the North and South.
1. Depth
Between 1960 and 1998, the level of the smaller lake fell by 13 meters; the level of the larger lake fell by 18 meters.
2. Surface area
In 1960, the Aral Sea was the fourth largest inland body of water, covering 67,000 square kilometers between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. According to the Environmental Justice Foundation, over the last fifty years, its size has shrunk by 40,000 square kilometers. The above photo is one of many that captures the loss of depth and the salty, silty soil quality of the former Aral Sea bed.
3. Salinity
The Aral Sea was a brackish lake, with salinity about one-third of the world’s oceans. In 1960, already compromised, its salinity measured 9.9 grams of salt per liter. In 1998, the large sea measured approximately 45 grams of salt per liter (455% increase); the small sea, approximately 30 g/l salinity (303% increase).
The increased salinity, loss of water depth and lake area for this groundwater-fed lake should not surprise us. In some months, river contribution to the Aral Sea is –nothing. Furthermore, when river water does come into the Aral Sea, its quality has been greatly compromised by agricultural and human use. Many of these salts are pesticide and fertilizer residue. The aridity of the region means that these salts are carried by the wind and breathed in by humans.
Three ways to measure economic loss
The loss of Aral Sea depth has ruined lake commerce. Trawlers that once plied the sea for fish (according to BBC, about 44,000 tons annually) are now stranded on the sandy lakebed. The maritime trade route between these two rural areas of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan has literally dried up.
The degradation of the Aral Sea area has also reduced habitat and species diversity in Central Asia. UNEP/GRIDA-Arendal has a great overview:
In 1960, the Aral Sea region was the home of:
70 species of mammals—now, 32 species of mammals
310 species of birds–at present, 160 species of birds
5-7 kinds of livestock fodder no longer grow in region
Disease and death of cattle and sheep showed marked increase.
The increase in Aral Sea salinity has also changed the species that can live within the water itself. Again, according to UNEP/GRIDA:
24 species of fish are at risk: two species now extinct.
The reason for the dearth of riverine input and poor water quality: unsustainable, inefficient, and failing irrigation systems. Check back on Tuesday for Part 2: Agriculture versus the Aral Sea.
The cost of Aral Sea degradation on human health has been horrific: Check back Wednesday for Part 3: The Aral Sea and Public Health.
References:
I am especially indebted to Beach, et al, for terminology—see Worth Reading Page, General;
Phillip Micklin’s great book on Central Asian water and Neil Field’s 1954 article on resource geography of the Amu Darya—see Worth Reading, Central Asia General.
UNEP/GRIDA-Arendal Home Page—Capacity Building and Environmental Knowledge for Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia: their Aral Sea Page is cited above.
The FPA Climate Change blog gives a world overview of what the Aral Sea represents specifically-see Bill Hewitt’s article on the latest reports
Map: Unimaps.com: Aral, the Dying Sea page has other great maps
Photo: (U.S.) National Geographic Society
April 9th, 2007 at 5:09 pm
[…] Bonnie Boyd has the first part of a series on the tremendous costs of the Aral Sea disaster. One of my regrets of my last trip to Kazakhstan was not seeing it in person. Hell, or much else beyond Karaganda, Astana, and Almaty. […]
April 9th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
[…] Bonnie Boyd begins a series of posts on the Aral Sea by discussing how we calculate the cost of the sea’s loss. Share This […]
April 11th, 2007 at 8:30 am
[…] As described in part one of this series, Aral Sea degradation has decimated commerce and killed livestock and fish-stocks. Wetlands-based industries, such as cane-gathering or muskrat breeding, are no longer possible. Feedstock growth is lessened; land can sustain less livestock. Nutritionally, this means that nearby communities can no longer access sources of protein. […]
April 11th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
The Aral Sea Disaster, part 1: Count the cost…
…
April 21st, 2007 at 8:53 pm
[…] The Aral Sea Disaster (Part 1, Part 2) - The Central Asia web log looks at the connection between large scale irrigation and the the changes in the Aral Sea. See also the article commemorating the 800th birthday of the poet Rumi […]
July 7th, 2007 at 12:54 am
Thank you for your extensive and very helpful research on this very important topic. I am setting up my own blog, which will chronicle the rescue efforts in the North Aral Sea and discuss possible ways to save the South Aral. I have linked to your blog and encouraged others to take a look at it. Again, thank you for your informative website!
July 9th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Dear George,
I wish you very much luck in bringing attention to the problems of the Aral Sea! That is a project well worth tackling. Thank you for all your kind words.
Sincerely,
Bonnie